http://www.womensprizeforfiction.co.uk/2014/baileys-womens-prize-for-fiction-announce-the-2014-shortlist |
The judges are given the key criteria for the Prize –
"accessibility, originality and excellence in writing by women".
That's fairy broad. It makes predicting the winner pretty difficult. Each book
is undoubtedly excellent. But which is best? It depends who you ask and what
they like.
Over the
last 6 weeks, I've been on a mission to read them all. It's the first prize
shortlist that I've ever read in its entirety (prior to the announcement of the
winner at least) so I have never truly been able to objectively view a
shortlist. I honestly think this is an incredible selection of titles. It's
truly diverse, featuring locations in India, Iceland, Nigeria, America,
Ireland, Russia, Germany and The Netherlands. The authors themselves are
American, Irish (x2), Australian, Nigerian and Indian-American- so even if the
reader (like me) is not especially well travelled, this year's shortlist offers
some fascinating looks into life in other countries and other times.
So who's
going to win? And if they are going to win, what's likely to edge it for them?
This is what I reckon...
Burial
Rites, by
Hannah Kent- (full review here)
If Burial
Rites wins, it will be down to the accessibility of this novel. Broad
enough to appeal to Nordic Noir fans, as well as crime fiction and historical
fiction readers, it offers something appealing to all at the same time that it
offers something perhaps less frequently experienced in these genres. It's
beautifully written, and frames a tragic story of loyalty and persecution with
some incredible and original settings.
If it
misses out, it will be because whilst it is an engaging, tragic read, on the
whole it is not really doing anything enormously new.
A Girl is
A Half Formed Thing, by
Eimear McBride- (full review here)
If it
wins, it will be for reinventing the modern novel. Its originality is
staggering and its fragmented, jerky prose (is it even prose??) creates such an
immediate narrative effect that it's an unforgettable reading experience. The
narrator does not tell her story, she shows it. It's brave, unique and
incredibly personal and the unnamed narrator is such an arresting, tragic
character.
If it
loses out, it will be because the style (which is so unique and effective)
could alienate some readers, and as accessibility is one of the three things to
look out for, this could prove a stumbling block.
The
Goldfinch, by Dona
Tartt- (full review here)
If this
wins, it will be because of the breathless, insane spectacle of this novel.
It's brilliantly original, intricate and filled with incredible characters. The
quality of the prose is astonishing, it's an absolute joy to read and the love
and the craft that's gone into this novel is evident on every page. I could
rave all day about its brilliance.
If
anything is going to ruin it for the Goldfinch, it would be the
size of it. The hardback is beautiful but enormous and I think many readers
that would otherwise love this novel might be deterred by its sheer bulk.
The
Undertaking, by
Audrey Magee (full review here)
The prose
is unique in that it is very dialogue heavy and quite dreamlike in its descriptions
of frozen Russia and the horrors of the Eastern front. It's unusual to see an
Axis perspective in WW2 fiction, and often narratives are more Western front
that Eastern. It's accessible on a technical level as the prose is so readable,
but it's incredibly thought provoking and the characters are so brilliantly
anonymous and evoke a strange type of empathy...so much so that it sometimes
comes as a surprise to be reminded that they are big believers in the Nazi
cause. It's accessible in that historical fiction readers would find it
appealing and the romantic and political elements might score extra readers.
If it
falls down on one thing it would be the dialogue style. While this is very well
handled, a lack of signposting might be considered frustrating, and I can see
why it could put people off. The plot could seem quite far fetched to some
readers.
Americanah, by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
(full review here)
An
honest, unique and well characterised story of race, loss and identity. The
character's blog posts help to characterise and to increase the novel's
uniqueness, as well adding substance to the style. The writing is beautiful,
the characters are excellent and the plot is both believable and sprawling.
It's an incredibly appealing novel, and really thought provoking, sensitively
written without asking for sympathy or (I think) being preachy.
If it
misses out, it could be down to an interpretation or fear of preaching.
Sensitive subjects being tackled honestly and without apology will always be in
danger of appearing preachy to some readers.
The
Lowland, by Jumpa
Lahiri (full review here)
A
dreamlike, absorbing read about life in and out of India. The characters'
relationships are expertly drawn up and the world feels real and authentic.
It's an engaging narrative of tradition versus success and the conflicting
sense of family loyalty under the strain of estrangement. Well written, but
sparse in style.
Though
it's enjoyable and stylish and the plot is engaging, the prose is lacking some
of the lyrical drama of the rest of the list. It's works within the style of
the narrative, but doesn't really hold up under direct comparison.
So- there are reasons why each of them might not win the Bailey's Prize
for Women's Fiction (and most of them I'm just Devil's advocating on). It
really is a struggle to call. All of the remaining titles are unique and though
some are more accessible than others, the reading is all the more rewarding for
weathering the storm. They are all examples of excellence in writing full stop-
it genuinely baffles me that the term "Women's Fiction" is usually
used so restrictively, when there's such an abundance of diverse writing by
women with such rich, evocative prose as these.
Gun to
head though...When the criteria have been weighed up, and they all obviously
meet the criteria or they would never have made it this far, I'm going with the
Goldfinch. Purely because as I was reading them, it is the one that I
enjoyed the most. It's the one I still think about and the one that I read most
quickly as I couldn't get enough. It is also the only one that I feel like I
want to read again.
No comments:
Post a Comment